说的好像南非共产党的哈尼没有被暗杀似的


说的好像沙佩维尔索韦托不存在似的。



这种断章取义的手法太低劣了。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_South_Africa

这里是迄今为止南非屠杀的记录。
南非并未“解决”……
某些人还是拉倒吧

1、作为一个基本常识,曼德拉和非洲民族解放运动不仅有社会主义倾向,而且得到了苏联的大力支持。

相反,南非白人种族隔离政权直接就是西方的打手。某些人就不要装了。
2、具体到本帖,当世界其它地方的“弱势”群体起而抗争的时候

比如台湾地区,比如1980年代的英国(这些人,包括主贴的刘瑜会站在矿工那边还是撒切尔那边根本就是大家心知肚明的事情)。

这些人的嘴脸早就见识过了……


装什么装!
本帖最后由 三苗 于 2015-1-24 13:35 编辑

没错啊,不是早就说了,在某些人眼里,“弱势群体”只有表现他们居高临下的“仁慈”的作用。


所以这些人就不要装了好伐。
http://www.globalpost.com/dispat ... dela-anc-terrorists

To Margaret Thatcher, the African National Congress under jailed leader Nelson Mandela was a “typical terrorist organization.”

When much of the world enforced sanctions on apartheid South Africa in the 1980s, Thatcher refused, instead pursuing a policy of “constructive engagement” with the country’s white minority government.

Now, after her death at age 87, the three-term British prime minister’s legacy is as polarizing in South Africa as it is in Britain, where the Manchester United soccer team decided not to hold a minute of silence before a Monday night game fearing the crowd response.

David Cameron, the current British prime minister, apologized for Thatcher’s policies on apartheid when he visited South Africa in 2006. Cameron said his Conservative party had made “mistakes” by failing to introduce sanctions against South Africa, and that Thatcher was wrong to have called the ANC “terrorists.”

Following news of her death, some South Africans on Twitter branded Thatcher an apartheid supporter, and took delight in the fact that Mandela, who is 94 and in poor health, has outlived her. Mandela was released from prison during Thatcher’s last year in office, and four years later became South Africa’s first black president.

“Mandela outlived Thatcher. 1-0 to FREEDOM! History is the ULTIMATE judge!” one tweet said.


When at a meeting of Commonwealth countries in 1987 a reporter suggested the ANC could come to power, Thatcher’s spokesperson said: “It is cloud cuckoo land for anyone to believe that could be done.”
关于撒切尔并配合主贴,又搜到了14楼的东西。

某些人的“底线”噢……
Ruling ANC uses violence to silence opposition

Activist and filmmaker Anita Khana writes from Johannesburg as the ANC turns on its radical opponents






   





30,000 people join an EFF rally near Pretoria


30,000 people join an EFF rally near Pretoria in May last year (Pic: Charlie Kimber)


Imagine over 20 riot police storming into parliament and forcibly removing members of the opposition.

That’s what happened in the South African national assembly on Thursday of last week at the opening of parliament.

MPs from Julius Malema’s Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) were violently ejected for asking a question about corruption during president Jacob Zuma’s state of the nation speech.

Seven MPs were injured as members of the ruling African National Congress (ANC) clapped and jeered.

Zuma resumed his speech with a giggle—and avoided all the key issues. He did not mention the xenophobic attacks on black non-South Africans.

Or the appalling joblessness of our youth, the enduring low wages of black workers, or the homelessness of hundreds of thousands.

Nor did he mention the Marikana massacre, or the £14 million stolen from state funds for his private residence in Nkandla—two issues that the EFF is keen to get answers on.

The move to silence the EFF was premeditated. Zuma spent the best part of 2014 ducking parliament in order to avoid embarrassing direct questions from the EFF that have exposed the ANC’s lack of regard for democratic processes.

For the opening of parliament, Cape Town was turned into a military zone, with heavily armed police vehicles and snipers lining key roadways.

The EFF, formed in 2013, is the most significant left split from the ANC since 1994 and a product of the crisis of enduring inequality in South Africa.

Leader

The EFF’s president Malema, once leader of the ANC Youth League, was the only politician to visit Marikana immediately after the 2012 massacre and to openly support the mineworkers’ struggle for a living wage.

The party’s demand for “economic freedom in our lifetime”, and commitment to nationalisation of mines, and land redistribution without compensation has resonated with many young black South Africans.

In recent months EFF local structures have actively organised and supported land occupations and the building of shacks, which have seen violent clashes with police.

In the 2014 election the EFF won 6 percent of the national vote and 25 MPs.

Its uncompromising stance in the national parliament regarding state corruption, parliamentary rules and its insistence that MPs wear workers’ uniforms is seeing its popularity rise.

The newly formed United Front (UF), initiated by the National Union of Metalworkers (Numsa), has called for a national day of action on 21 March, against police brutality and the EFF will support it.

Both the EFF and the UF represent those who see the need for strong organisation that represents the interests of the poor and oppressed, and is independent of the ANC.

But the EFF and UF’s inability to come together at leadership level is weakening the potential for a mass fightback.

However in the townships, workplaces and informal settlements, EFF members and UF supporters often find themselves thrown together as they take on local demands.

The rapidity at which democracy is breaking down demands a speedy unity.

The 21 March day of action provides an opportunity for this unity to be visible.

In January Zuma told business leaders at the World Economic Forum in Davos that South Africa is open for business—this means more attacks on the working class.
http://www.socialistworker.co.uk ... +silence+opposition